Many people know that
But in reality
Let us consider in more detail the first result. Of course, a series of natural numbers diverges in the classical sense (in the sense of convergence of a sequence of partial sums: it, of course, has no limit). In
this article, the author mentions other summation methods, such as the Cesaro method and the Abel method. Here are some examples: the sum of such a series
using the cesaro method will be equal
.
Another example:
In my opinion, it is wrong to say that the sum of the first row is equal to
; correctly say that the sum of the first row
in the sense of Cesaro is equal to
. Similarly for the second: its sum
in the sense of Abel is equal to
.
In view of this, in the first result (that
) there is a substitution of concepts, which leads to a contradiction with common sense.
We now consider in more detail the second result. First, we denote the entire amount for
:
Now we perform the following transformations:
From here
There is another solution. Combine the terms in another way:
i.e
In fact, starting from the top three, we can distinguish 7 terms, the sum of which will be 49, and we will come to the equation
which will give the same result.
In general, you need to act like this: select the first
terms, and then in parentheses take
terms:
Arithmetic progression
is equal to , therefore, we obtain the equation
where does it turn out that