Несколько известных биологов нарушили табу и опубликовали научные работы прямо в интернете

. « ?»

---

29 , , . bioRxiv , «» .

2000 Radiohead, - . , bioRxiv #ASAPbio — , .

«», . bioRxiv , 2048 — , .

ASAPbio , . - .


, , ,

- . #ASAPbio , , — — , . ASAPbio , .

Varmus:...we also must fulfill our contract to the public who supports our ability to do research #ASAPbio

— Kenneth Gibbs (@KennyGibbsPhD) 17 2016 .

Tidak seperti fisikawan, di mana pracetak menjadi metode publikasi yang biasa di tahun 90-an, peneliti biomedis biasanya mengharapkan lebih dari enam bulan. , — — , . , . , , - , . , , .

, - , Science, Nature Cell . , , .

, Science Nature, , . , . . , Cell, .

, , , .

@amy_harmon Not defending it, just explaining. Young scientists would rather have their paper in a high-profile journal.

— Anne Carpenter (@DrAnneCarpenter) 27 2016 .

, , , . , , , .

, , .

What it feels like trying to publish. #ASAPbio pic.twitter.com/bJCaFqrop7

— Jonathan A. Michaels (@JonAMichaels) 25 2016 .

. . , , , , . : ?

#ASAPbio Open and rapid sharing is important for Zika virus. Also needed for:

— Lenny Teytelman (@lteytelman) 16 2016 .

, Sci-Hub , . , , .

Sci-Hub is illegal: when libraries become illegal, you know something went wrong #copyright

— Sci Hub (@Sci_Hub) 26 2016 .

#ASAPbio . , , , .

, . , Cell, #ASAPbio . , , . , , . . - , .

Post-publication review of public-health research, what could possibly go wrong? #asapbio

— Andrew Miller (@EndoMetabPub) 17 2016 .

ASAPbio , , , bioRxiv , « ». , . , .

, , , , , . , , . , , .

« : , — , - . — ».

, ,  . , , .

Will preprints disrupt bioscience publishing? Perhaps they should. Disruption is needed, for many reasons. #ASAPbio @NatureNews

— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) 19 2016 .

, , . , , . , #ASAPbio, , : , , . , , , « 20 ».

it's pretty amazing that it took 20 years for "scientists should post their work on the Internet" to not be viewed as radical #ASAPbio

— Michⓐel Eisen (@mbeisen) 22 2016 .